Groundwater currently supplies almost all residential and municipal water needs in the upper Verde River watershed (Big Chino Valley, the Prescott area, Chino Valley, and part of Prescott Valley) and the Verde Valley within the middle Verde River watershed.
Critically, these two watersheds provide the groundwater that sustains year-round flow of the Verde River and its perennial tributaries, their crucial riparian functions, and agricultural irrigation in the Verde Valley.
Reports of the U.S. Geological Survey clearly show that pumping of groundwater that began in these areas in the 1900s has lowered and will continue to lower groundwater tables and to decrease perennial streamflow. Unmitigated additional pumping will amplify both effects.
Development of housing, infrastructure, and business to support an ever-growing population is generally recognized as the backbone of our economy. Unfortunately, further groundwater pumping is the only obviously available source of new water to meet the future water needs for this growth. The ever greater likelihood of a warming climate adds to the challenge of supplying water to meet future demand.
What are some of the expected eventual consequences of pumping ever more groundwater to supply future needs?
Dry stretches and irreparable damage to the Verde River.
Loss of surface-water use by water-right holders that include agricultural irrigators in the Verde Valley and, farther downstream, irrigators and municipalities in parts of Maricopa County.
Loss of riparian habitat and associated wildlife.
Increasing loss of once-productive domestic wells as water tables decline.
Necessity to deepen or relocate some currently productive municipal wells.
Economic loss as damage to the river increases and assurance of adequate water for human use decreases.
Concern is growing in Arizona about impending water-supply problems in the state's major metropolitan areas from threatened shortfalls in the delivery of Colorado River water.
At the same time, there is little if any plan at the state level to deal with declining future water resources in rural areas such as the upper and middle Verde River watersheds.
Local political expediency requires understanding that we in the Verde River Basin are essentially on our own and have little choice but to live within our means by fulfilling future water-resource needs from within our own resources.
Maintaining a healthy Verde River and supplying the water needs of future generations requires that we both reduce our dependence on groundwater and find ways to augment our groundwater supply in order to offset our future pumping demands.
What tools might we apply regionally, as connected watershed communities, to protect our shared groundwater and live within our means?
Conservation, especially by installation of or conversion to low water-use landscaping (xeriscaping).
Maximized use of treated wastewater for groundwater recharge, irrigation, or other non-potable use (for example, treated wastewater returned via purple pipe for toilet flushing).
Roof-top rainwater harvesting at residences and businesses. Average annual rainfall ranges from about 13 inches in Chino Valley, Cottonwood, and Camp Verde to about 18 inches in Prescott and Sedona. One inch of water harvested from rainfall on a single 1,000 square-foot roof would provide approximately 620 gallons of water that could be used for non-potable uses such as yard irrigation, laundry, or toilet flushing. An alternative where geologic conditions permit would be aquifer recharge via dry wells that capture roof drainage from the downspouts.
Collection of runoff from hard surfaces such as roads, driveways, and parking areas in residential developments and business lots or business parks could be substantial and, water-quality permitting, would most likely be directed to aquifer recharge.
Capture of flood-water runoff to support aquifer recharge, for example, via check dams along normally-dry washes where geologic conditions would permit infiltration or by diversion to infiltration basins.
Purchase of development rights (also known as conservation easement) programs to financially compensate willing landowners for not developing their land. This is a tool that can benefit both landowners and communities while simultaneously protecting groundwater, wildlife habitat, and farming or ranching.
Regional application of any one of these tools has cost and is insufficient by itself to fully prevent further decline of water tables.
Further, each requires, to varying degree, technical evaluation, public acceptance, political support, and regulatory change.
However, meeting the costs and applying these tools as appropriate across our watersheds may reduce or eliminate a need to apply stringent regulation of groundwater pumping as the only workable tool.
Application of such tools is surely preferable to failing to meet the future water needs of our citizens and losing the aesthetic, ecological, recreational, and economic benefits of a free-flowing, perennial Verde River.
For more information about the Verde River, please visit the Verde River Basin Partnership website at: www.vrbp.org.
Ed Wolfe is the Chairman of the Verde River Basin Partnership.
More like this story
- Commentary: Verde River: Time to collaborate and act
- Commentary: Balancing our water budget
- GUEST EDITORIAL: Demand for water for growing populace will result in increasing costs for delivery
- My Turn: Now we know and now is the time to take action
- Commentary: Demands of growth a constant challenge to Verde River