Giffords urges lawmakers to enact reasonable gun restrictions

With wife Gabrielle Giffords looking on Thursday, husband and former astronaut Mark Kelly details the launch of an Arizona coalition to push for what he said are more sensible gun laws. (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer)

With wife Gabrielle Giffords looking on Thursday, husband and former astronaut Mark Kelly details the launch of an Arizona coalition to push for what he said are more sensible gun laws. (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer)

PHOENIX -- Former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and husband Mark Kelly have a message for Arizona lawmakers: Enact reasonable gun restrictions or we'll help elect people who will.

And if necessary, Kelly, co-founder of Americans for Responsible Solutions with Giffords, said the group will take its case directly to voters.

At a press conference Thursday to launch the Arizona Coalition for Common Sense, Kelly acknowledged the political hurdles here.

"Arizona is different,'' he said, with a long history of -- and relationship with -- firearms. "Arizona could be a tricky state when you consider this.''

Kelly said the first line of attack is to try to change policy. He said that involves convincing lawmakers that a majority of Arizonans want to close what some call the gun show "loophole'' that exempts people who buy weapons from another individual from having to go through the same background check as they would if purchasing a firearm from a licensed dealer.

That could prove next to impossible. In fact a bill making its way through the process this session goes in the exact opposite direction, specifically precluding local governments from imposing their own background check laws.

But Kelly, a former astronaut, said Americans for Responsible Solutions does more than just lobby. He said it has an annual budget approaching $15 million.

"And we spend a lot of that money around election time of November of even years,'' Kelly said.

"When we can't get a legislature to pass a bill that not only do we feel makes sense but that the citizens of that state overwhelmingly support, we will work really hard to elect people to the legislature that will support the bill,'' he continued. "And we've done that over and over again.''

The group also has something beyond money: Giffords herself who survived a 2011 assassination attempt at a Tucson event with constituents, an incident that killed six others.

And if lobbying and working to oust certain legislators doesn't work, Kelly said the possibility remains to craft their own measures and seek to have them approved at the ballot box. He said the group was involved in successful ballot measures for universal background checks in Washington, California and Nevada.

Still, Kelly said he would prefer not to travel that route in Arizona.

"The best approach would be for us to initially meet with the folks in the legislature and do our own lobbying for these bills that, as I said, 82 percent of Arizonans support,'' he said. "Ultimately, if that doesn't work, use our other options.''

Kelly said he and Giffords also want to meet with Gov. Doug Ducey. But he sidestepped a question of whether he believes the governor would be receptive to his group's message,

"Not on this issue, but just generically, I have found the governor to be a thoughtful person who people can work with,'' Kelly responded.

"I'm looking forward at some point to meet with him on this issue and explain these things to him,'' he continued. "You know, we may have some things in common on the issue.''

The only gun-related measure Ducey ever vetoed was a proposal to tie Arizona's gun laws to what other states adopt. But even in that case the governor reasserted he is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, saying he wants Arizona to "continue to chart its own course'' on gun laws.

Kelly acknowledged Ducey's record.

"So we will discuss that if I get the opportunity to speak to him about that.''

During the press conference, Kelly rattled off figures he said prove the need for regulations.

"From 2001 through 2010, 3,303 people were murdered by guns in Arizona alone,'' he said. And Kelly argued that number could be brought down with new gun laws, including mandatory background checks.

"In the states and the District of Columbia that already require background checks for all gun sales, specifically for hand gun sales, 46 percent fewer women are shot to death by their partners,'' he said. "There are 48 percent fewer firearm suicides and 48 percent fewer law enforcement officers are shot to death by hand guns.''

But Dave Kopp who lobbies for the Arizona Citizens Defense League which is behind most of the measures liberalizing gun laws, said equating gun violence with the lack of background checks is "a false equivalent.''

Kopp said the federal government does millions of such checks every year and rejects just 2 percent. And most of those, he said, are mistakes and the gun sale eventually goes through.

And Kopp rejected the contention that those who know they can't pass a federal background check will seek out weapons in private sales, including at gun shows.

"People who are looking to buy guns illegally are buying them illegally,'' he said, saying all background checks do is impose additional hurdles on law-abiding citizens. "A criminal is going to buy a gun whether he goes through a law-abiding citizen or not.''

Other than blocking local background checks, measure going through the process this session include providing additional protections from civil suit for businesses that let patrons bring their weapons in their establishments, immunizing people from prosecution for what they claim are accidental discharges of firearms, and permitting people to use a certain type of small caliber ammunition in city limits.

On Twitter: @azcapmedia

Comments

Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comment submissions may not exceed a 200 word limit, and in order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.

Pintobeans 1 year, 1 month ago

This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.

0

JonahHirsh 1 year, 1 month ago

To Giffords, Kelly, Bloomberg, Watts et al "reasonable" gun laws are those that restrict normal, average Americans' behavior to only that of which they approve. Restrict, restrict, restrict, never expand. Such is the raison d'être for the Democrat Party - RESTRICT.

That dog don't hunt.

We are sick and tired of it, and once Gorsuch is seated (followed by a a replacement for "Buzzy" Ginsburg, who is sure to retire soon), the line of cert petitioners will form in a systematic effort to get all this cacadoody struck down, item by item, case by case.

Once the SCOTUS has spoken, these progressive tyrants will have no choice but to shut up and go away

0

JonahHirsh 1 year, 1 month ago

The raison d'être for the Democrat Party - RESTRICT.

That dog don't hunt.

Once Gorsuch is seated the line of cert petitions will form to get all this stuff struck down, item by item, case by case.

0

ramrodd 1 year, 1 month ago

where are other comments?

The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)]

0

ramrodd 1 year, 1 month ago

Background Checks are Unconstitutional-and Ineffective.. The instant background check system was supposedly going to stop only criminals from purchasing firearms, but is now regularly used to disarm law-abiding Americans.

Background Checks Unconstitutional—and Ineffective

Gun Owners of America has opposed the federal background check system since its inception both on constitutional grounds and because it laid the foundation for gun owner registration and other dangerous government abuse.

Our fears were justified when, beginning in the 1990s, nearly 200,000 veterans lost their gun rights after the Clinton administration determined that vets who needed help managing their finances were suddenly “prohibited persons.”

0

Fiftycal 1 year, 1 month ago

So Mr. Gabby is gonna fix them mean, evil gunowners, huh? Well Mr. Gabby, how much of that $15 mil are you going to spend on YOURSELF? How much do you get for a "salary"? How many five star hotels and swanky restaurants do you pay for with your "non-profit" credit card? How much of that $15 mil comes straight from globalists Bloomberg and Soros? 95%? Too bad your "wife" got shot, but I am not turning in MY GUNZ to make YOU FEEL SAFER!

0